Showing posts with label CIA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CIA. Show all posts

Friday, August 02, 2013

Russia grants Snowden asylum:

                                                  Edward Snowden's new Russian passport:


RUSSIA GRANTS ASYLUM
TO EDWARD SNOWDEN:

Massive diplomatic snub
to Washington:

On August 1,  Edward Snowden was granted asylum in the Russian Federation and left the Sheremetyevo Airport transit zone.

Earlier, a source close to the matter reported this information explaining that the customs officers received the required papers from Federal Migration Service giving Snowden the right to stay in Russia. He’s “formally in Russia’s territory.” He added that the former CIA employee currently "has all the necessary documents to legally stay in Russia". He cannot be deported to the United States, even if the country makes an official request, a source in the Russian law enforcement agencies told news agencies on Thursday. “The granting of temporary asylum protects Snowden from deportation, because under the law a person, who was granted temporary asylum, cannot be returned against his will to the country, a citizen of which he is, or to the place of his permanent residence.”

His legal representative, Anatoly Kucherena said: “I have just handed over to him papers from the Russian Immigration Service. They are what he needs to leave the transit zone.” Kucherena told state broadcaster Russia 24: “I have just seen him off. He has left for a secure location. Security is a very serious matter for him.”

Kucherena told Reuters: “He is the most wanted man on planet Earth. What do you think he is going to do?” “He has to think about his personal security. I cannot tell you where he is going.” “I put him in a taxi 15 to 20 minutes ago and gave him his certificate on getting refugee status in the Russian Federation. He can live wherever he wants in Russia. It’s his personal choice.” Mr Snowden left accompanied by WikiLeaks representative, Sarah Harrison. She twittered saying:

“We would like to thank the Russian people and all those others who have helped to protect Mr. Snowden. We have won the battle – now the war.”

He has been granted temporary asylum through at least through July 31, 2014. He can extend it annually on request. Doing so lets him stay in Russia permanently. He can make a new life there if he chooses. He’s got plenty of time to decide. He won’t be sent back to America. At 15:30 Moscow time (11:30 GMT), he left Sheremetyevo Airport transit zone.

In a formal statement issued to the Press Mr Snowden explained his actions:
 

“I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded,” he said. "That is not something I am willing to support or live under. I don’t want to live in a world where there’s no privacy, and therefore no room for intellectual exploration and creativity. I have no intention of hiding who I am because I know I have done nothing wrong".



"I had been looking for leaders, but I realised that leadership is about being the first to act. There are more important things than money. If I were motivated by money, I could have sold these documents to any number of countries and gotten very rich. The great fear that I have regarding the outcome for America of these disclosures is that nothing will change. People won’t be willing to take the risks necessary to stand up and fight to change things. And in the months ahead, the years ahead, it’s only going to get worse".
DIPLOMACY NORMS:
Konstantin Dolgov, the Russian Foreign Ministry’s special representative for human rights and the rule of law, said that when pressing for the return of Snowden, who was stranded in the transit zone of Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, the United States should not claim that Russia is under any obligation to do so:
“In any situation of international significance, we remain committed to the fulfillment of corresponding international obligations,” the Russian diplomat said. “When obligations exist, we fulfil them. But they should not be invented in cases where they do not exist,” he said.
Washington has repeatedly called on Moscow to reject Snowden’s request for asylum and send him back to the United States to stand trial on charges of espionage and theft. However, Dolgov said Russia has not yet received a formal US request to extradite Snowden. US officials have requested Russia to return Snowden, arguing that although the two states have no formal extradition treaty, Washington has allegedly returned a number of Russians following requests from Moscow. Dolgov said the United States had failed to provide Russia with a list of those individuals, adding that the terms “extradition” and “deportation” were not interchangeable and should not be confused. “As far as I know, there have been no cases [of extradition] from US territory. Although people are indeed being deported, it’s not because of Russia’s demands, but because they have violated US law,” the Russian diplomat said.

Since nothing done by the Kremlin is uncalculated, this decision to resist Washington's pressure has to have been decided at top level, meaning President Vladimir Putin himself. Putin  said  previously that US intelligence fugitive  Edward Snowden was staying in the transit area of a Moscow airport because Washington had “blocked” him there by intimidating countries that had been ready to grant him asylum. “He arrived on our territory without an invitation. He wasn’t flying to us. He was on a transit flight to other countries,” Putin said in St. Petersburg, adding that the United States had “intimidated other countries, so that nobody wants him.” “That’s how they blocked him on our territory,” Putin said. Putin added that Russia would not extradite Snowden to the United States, where he could face the death penalty. But the Kremlin has also tried to keep its distance from the case, emphasising that it is a human rights issue.




WASHINGTON immediately criticised the Russian decision and hinted that it could cancel a planned bilateral summit between US President Barack Obama and Russian President Vladimir Putin at next month's G20 Summit in St Petersburg.  “We have a wide range of interests with the Russians, and we are evaluating the utility of a summit,” White House spokesman Jay Carney told a news briefing on Thursday in reference to the two leaders’ planned meeting next month, adding that the United States is “extremely disappointed” that Russia has given refuge to Snowden.
Carney declined to discuss if or how Washington might respond in the aftermath of Snowden’s asylum and said that while the White House is examining the value of the scheduled Obama-Putin summit, he did not have any changes in the US president’s schedule to announce. Obama plans to travel to Russia next month for the G20 meeting in St. Petersburg, a trip which includes the scheduled bilateral meeting with Putin in Moscow.
Carney indicated that US authorities would continue to press Russia for help in bringing Snowden into the custody of the Americans. “We will obviously be in contact with Russian authorities expressing our extreme disappointment in this decision and making the case clearly that there is absolute legal justification for Mr. Snowden to be returned to the United States” Carney told reporters. Both Carney and US State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said that Russia did not notify the United States in advance of its decision to grant asylum to Snowden
Prominent US politicians, meanwhile, expressed outrage over Russia’s approval of Snowden’s asylum request, saying it deals a significant blow to bilateral relations. US Sen. John McCain, a consistent  critic of the Obama administration and  called the move “a slap in the face of all Americans.”  “Now is the time to fundamentally rethink our relationship with Putin’s Russia,” McCain said in a statement. “We need to deal with the Russia that is, not the Russia we might wish for. We cannot allow today’s action by Putin to stand without serious repercussions.”
McCain called on the Obama administration to respond in part by expanding the blacklist of Russian officials sanctioned under the controversial Magnitsky Act and extending membership in the North Atlanta Treaty Organization (NATO) to the former Soviet republic of Georgia, whose ambitions to join the military alliance have angered Moscow in recent years. Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, called Snowden’s asylum “a setback to US-Russian relations” despite being only granted for a period of one year. Snowden “is a fugitive who belongs in a United States courtroom, not a free man deserving of asylum in Russia,” Menendez said in a statement.
Sen. Tom Coburn said in a television interview with MSNBC on Thursday that Snowden’s asylum “probably hurts the relationship” between Russia and the United States and suggested Russian intelligence had exploited the former NSA contractor’s knowledge of US intelligence programs – a claim both Snowden and Russian officials have denied. “He’s undoubtedly in my mind a traitor to our country and probably most of what he knows, the Russians already know. … It’s a gold mine for them,” Coburn said.
Kremlin aide Yury Ushakov told reporters in Moscow on Thursday that Snowden’s asylum “is not important enough to affect political relations” between the United States and Russia, adding that Moscow was interested in the development of ties with Washington “in all areas".
 
The outrage of the US Senate rabble rousers notwithstanding, the Russian decision will be welcomed by supporters of Mr Snowden and regard it as a significant defeat for the US National Surveillance State.



(see also Blagaroon 2; Bradley Manning trial ends;
 
http://blagaroon2.blogspot.ie/2013/08/bradley-manning-major-threat-to-us.html#comment-form)
 
 
 
 
 









Sunday, January 13, 2013

Irish Government aligns with EU/NATO on Syria




IRISH GOVERNMENT
ALIGNS WITH EU/NATO 
COVERT WAR IN SYRIA:


Tánaiste (Deputy Premier) and Foreign Minister, Éamonn Gilmore, has joined with three other Foreign Ministers of EU member states, Austria, Denmark and Slovenia in calling for the Syrian President Bashir al-Assad to be brought to the International Criminal Court for alleged crimes against the Syrian people. A statement has been published by Gilmore, Michael Spindelegger (Austria), Karl Erjavec (Slovenia), and Villy Søvndal (Denmark), in their "personal capacity" but would hardly be issued publicly without the agreement of the Governments concerned.

The proposal in itself is highly contentious . Realities are reversed as the Syrian government is identified as responsible for committing atrocities, when in fact the killings of civilians, including extrajudicial assassinations, have in large measure been conducted by imported foreign death squads some of which are known to have been trained at former KLA terrorist camps in the Kosovo enclave controlled by EU/NATO. The existence of “opposition” terror brigades integrated by mercenaries and funded by NATO, Turkey, Qatar,  and Saudi Arabia (Those well-known bulwarks of Democracy and Human Rights) is not mentioned. Nor is the existence of the Al Nusra Front, affiliated to al Qaeda in Iraq, supported covertly by the CIA.

The Statement as issued is as follows:

"Over the months, we have been following the events in Syria with growing concern. We support the aspirations of the Syrian people to freely choose a government that represents all the enriching diversity of this multi-confessional nation, one that respects the rule of law, human rights and democracy. It is deplorable that the current regime in Damascus has not heeded the repeated calls for a peaceful transition of powerAs do our colleagues from the Arab League, we strongly condemn the violence by the al-Assad regime against the Syrian people. We call on all sides to end the violence and to genuinely support the U.N.-led efforts to achieve a political solution [The Damascus government has accepted all calls for a ceasefire and negotiations with genuine opposition elements but, has rejected arrogant EU/NATO demands that President al-Assad leave office. Does "all-sides" include EU/NATO covert intervention?].

But recent developments have given reason for even more serious concern. U.N. peacekeepers were seriously injured when a convoy of the UNDOF peacekeeping operation on the Golan Heights was attacked. Reports about possible preparations for the use of chemical weapons circulate. [Yes, they "circulate" but where is the origin of these reports? Mostly from US/NATO/CIA sources].

The al-Assad regime is preparing Damascus for confrontation with the rebels and we know that these situations of last stand urban fighting often result in the most terrible atrocities being committed in armed conflict, with particular dangers for civilians. Concerned that the crisis in Syria may soon reach a new level of violence, we publicly appeal to all parties to the conflict to abide by international law, especially international humanitarian law and human rights law, and to recall that all those that commit or order war crimes and crimes against humanity will be held accountable. This principle cannot and will not be negotiated. [How about EU/NATO abiding by International Law and stop interfering in the internal affairs of other countries? When has EU/NATO ever been held accountable for its war crimes? Bombing Yugoslavia in 1999 for example]

As we know from the work of the U.N. Commission of Inquiry on Syria, horrendous crimes have already been committed during the conflict in Syria, but there have been no consequences for the perpetrators. [Only days after Pillay issued her report, it was revealed that the figures had been supplied by Benetech, an organisation funded by the US State Department and the "National Endowment for Democracy". a neo-liberal group engaged in funding so-called "dissidents" in countries considered hostile by the USA] It is precisely for situations like this that the international community established the permanent International Criminal Court (ICC) ten years ago. This independent judicial body can provide justice when a state is unable or unwilling to prosecute the most terrible crimes. Since Syria is not a party to the ICC Statute, jurisdiction of the Court requires a decision of the U.N. Security Council. In view of the grave concerns mentioned above, and the lack of prosecution in Syria, we call on the U.N. Security Council to urgently refer the situation in Syria to the ICC. In this respect, we welcome the Conclusions of the European Union Foreign Affairs Council on December 10, 2012 and the Swiss initiative at the United Nations to achieve this goal.

A referral to the ICC – which has repeatedly been suggested by the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay – has several advantages. The Court is a neutral and impartial institution that investigates and prosecutes the most serious crimes on all sides. A referral would give the leaders of the Syrian opposition a strong argument to call for discipline among its diverse forces [Note: they don't make any call for a ceasefire and withdrawal of the foreign terror gangs imported into Syria by EU/NATO, Quatar and Saudi Arabia] It would give the members of the al-Assad regime a further reason to question their allegiance. And it could assist the search for a political solution to the conflict. As we saw in other crises, parallel political and judicial processes are mutually supporting. There is no decision to be taken here between either peace or justice – a sustainable, long-term solution requires both.

Most important, however, a referral to the ICC would make clear to every fighter on all sides of the conflict that the gravest crimes will eventually be punished. We owe this not only to the victims and their families, but also to future generations of Syrians who want to live in a free state founded on the principles of peace and justice. And we owe it to the future of humankind: After thousands of years of sometimes gruesome history, human civilization must no longer accept impunity for the most atrocious crimes. Only if we make absolutely clear that these crimes will not go unpunished, can we reduce the likelihood that humankind will have to suffer from them in the future".

 HYPROCISY

Mealy-mouthed hypocrisy of the worst kind; calling for peace and justice while giving back-handed support to the foreign terrorists wrecking Syria. No one is saying al-Assad is any kind of democrat but, they can't seriously expect that his heavily armed regime would give up without a fight.

This is another damaging blow by Gilmore to Irish Neutrality which has been the policy of his Labour Party for decades. Along with his Government's recent decision to seek an increase in US military flights through Shannon Airport and failure to implement their promises to enforce international law on these flights as publicly stated in their Programme for Government in 2011.

For a different view of the conflict in Syria, watch this:




FearFeasaMacLéinn
Áth Cliath/Dublin
Eanáir /January 13 2013