Four Courts, Dublin, seat of the Irish Supreme Court. |
REVIVES CITIZEN
CHALLENGE TO
LISBON TREATY :
Profound International implications;
Panic in Government circles;
State caught by surprise;
The Irish Supreme Court in Dublin today ruled that the State
had a case to answer in a public interest petition first entered in 2009 on
questions on abridgement of citizens’ rights in the holding of the second
Lisbon Treaty referendum that year following the rejection of the Treaty by the
Irish people in 2008.
Since the State didn’t bother to send any representatives to
the hearing this morning, the Judges, Chief Justice, Ms Susan Denham, Mr Justice
Hardiman and Mr Justice Charleton, ordered that the State immediately deliver
all relevant documents in their possession to the petitioner and further
ordered that the State prepare a case to answer the concerns of the petitioner
in three weeks’ time from today’s date.
This is a profound shock to an arrogant State bureaucracy which
has consistently ignored concerns for citizens’ rights in the continuous power
grabs by the Brussels dictatorship in various treaties culminating in the
Lisbon Treaty which is now the basic legal document of the EU having
consolidated all previous treaties into the Lisbon provisions. Panic has broken
out in official circles as the international implications of a ruling against
the State on the validity of the Lisbon 2 referendum in the full hearing in
three weeks time are profound. If the Irish Treaty referendum is ruled void,
the legal basis of the entire EU ceases to exist and the Euro ceases to exist
as a legal currency.
Since we are not in the business of offering free legal
advice to the State we will not discuss the legal grounds of the petitioner’s
case here and presume the State will set their legal hacks to work on their own
behalf and we will only discuss the general implications of this case for Irish
Constitutional rights of citizens against State negligence. Presumably, large
quantities of headache pills will be delivered to Government offices overnight and
plans for Christmas shopping trips and holidays will have to be revised.
During the Lisbon Treaty
referendum campaigns in 2008 and 2009 the ‘NO’ Campaign repeatedly warned of
the implications for democracy and citizen’s rights throughout the EU if the Treaty
were adopted but, obviously these were ignored by the mad rush of the political
elite here, and the corporate monopolies who fund them, to sign up to Brussels’
latest power-grab at the time. When the people rejected the Treaty in the first
referendum in 2008, Sarkozy himself came to Dublin to “listen” to the Irish
people; fat lot of good it did us however big Sarkynoze’s ears were. In the
Europarliament, Martin Schulz, leader of the so-called “socialists” described
the Irish people as “idiots”. We shall see soon enough who the idiots were. In the second referendum in 2009, the
corporate monopolies and their lackeys spent €40M to sway the vote in their
direction while the ‘NO’ campaign was restricted by law to a budget of €4,000.
9 comments:
Were you at the hearing? What is your source for the Government's dismay
Many thanks for this blog post. This case was not reported anywhere except by yourself and a local newspaper, Local.ie, and was copied to Global Research, Canada. I have ascertained this morning through the Supreme Court office that what you say is true, except that there has been as yet no date fixed for the hearing, so where the date of 14th December came from, I am not sure.
While the citizens of Ireland play and sleep their way into Christmas and beyond, thank goodness you at least are awake.
Many thanks again.
Mairead Lonergan
Anymore on this please
Anymore on this please
Update?
Update?
Hi, what has happened or is happening about the Lisbon Treaty challenge? Any chance of an update? Many thanks.
Margaret
Awaiting a Supreme Court judgement
And now we know how it went. Congratulations to Harry Rea . Thanks, Blagaroon, for highlighting this. I haven't seen it in the papers and it wasn't on broadcast news, they have obviously have more important things to report on
than Ireland's sovereignty.
Post a Comment