A socio-political and cultural blog from the Republic of Ireland. The truth about the Celtic Tiger, it's demise and other related matters. Fír-eolas ar an Tíogar Cheiltigh, a thurnamh agus nithe gaolmhara eile.
OBAMA TO ATTACK SYRIA REGARDLESS OF CONSEQUENCES: KERRY STATEMENT A CLOWNISH DIATRIBE OF SYRIA:
The determination of the Obama government to mount a military strike on
Syria on the basis of spurious allegations on use of chemical weapons will have grave consequences for world peace and security and only exacerbate the tragic civil war
there with more death and destruction in the name of "humanitarian intervention".
US Secretary of State,John Kerry, went on public media today with a
prepared statement of purported "evidence" possessed by the US that
the Assad Government in Syria had carried out a chemical attack on civilians in
Damascus last week.
No such thing. Kerry's meandering statement of abuse of the Syrian Government
laced with references to dubious You Tube videos, anecdotal reports by
unidentified "medical sources", "reporters on the ground" and
unverified "intelligence" was a farrago of stale propaganda being
peddled by his new Al Qaeda jihadist friends for months now and contained no
concrete evidence from any independent reliable sources to prove anything other
than the Washington Government is using these discredited and false flag
concoctions as an excuse to join the civil war in Syria with an attack on the
military assets of the Syrian Government and assist the rag-tag collection of
terrorists causing mayhem and murder in Syria for the past two years.
Deprived of the fig-leaf of "international" action by yesterday's
democratic decision by the House of Commons in London to disallow British
forces to participate in military aggression against Syria, Washington's
Imperialist agenda of regime change in Damascus, like Libya previously, is
exposed to full view. Discounting the efforts of the United Nations as they did
in Iraq in 2003 and accusing Russia and China of "obstructionism"
although both allowed the resolution on Libya to pass, Kerry ignores the US
veto on every single resolution of the Security Council condemning Israeli war
crimes against the Palestinian people including the use of chemical weapons
such as white phosphorous against the civilian population of Gaza in 2009. No
bombing missions or condemnations allowed on Zionist Israel.
Kerry's deviant logic in claiming that Iran was developing nuclear
weapons because of being attacked with chemical weapons by Saddam Hussein in
the Iraq-Iran war of the 1980's (weapons supplied to Iraq by US companies in a
savage irony to Kerry's condemnation of Syria) is worthy of a Dr Goebbels
propaganda outburst.
Kerry's statement would be laughable except that it is the preliminary to
an aggressive military strike on Syria for political gain in which unknown
numbers of people in Damascus will be killed to advance US imperialist aims and
to save face for Mr Obama's "red line" speech last year. The
stultifying hypocrisy of this shows how far the NATO war criminals will go to pursue
their imperialist agenda.
Irish Foreign Minister and Deputy Prime Minister, Eamon Gilmore said yesterday
that a solution to the Syrian crisis should be sought by diplomatic means; Mr
Gilmore said “the appropriate place” for an international response to the
alleged use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime was “through the United
Nations and particularly through the United Nations Security Council”.
Answering press queries on the safety of Irish peacekeeping troops in the UN GolanHeights mission Mr Gilmore said: "The safety and security of Irish troops in the Middle East region has
been paramount in the Government’s discussions with the United Nations on the
Syrian crisis".
Mr Gilmore said the matter
had been a central point when he spoke to UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon
about the situation in Syria. “We have been assured by the United Nations that every arrangement that
is possible will be put in place to ensure their safety and security. But it is
obviously something that we will continue to discuss with the UN,” he said.
Some 115 Irish troops are to be sent to the Golan Heights area, between Israel
and Syria, next month to join three others serving the area. A further 360
Irish troops are stationed in Lebanon as part of a UN force and there are
concerns military personnel could be at risk from reprisal attacks should the
US and other allies launch air strikes on Syria.
ALLIES DECLINE TO SUPPORT ILLEGAL
WARFARE; GERMANY,
ITALY AND SPAIN DECAMP;
CYPRUS PROTESTS USE OF
BRITISH BASES FOR ATTACK ON
SYRIA:
The plans for an attack on Syria
by the US and Britain began to unravel today as mounting popular opposition
domestically and political forces demanded evidence be provided to back up Washington
and London's crude propaganda attempts to slander the Damascus government with responsibility
for an alleged chemical attack in east Damascus last week which supposedly
caused several hundred civilian casualties in the rebel opposition controlled
suburb of the city.
Anti-War coalitions in the US
and Europe have begun mobilisation against the criminal intent of the
Washington and London elites and demonstrations have already been mounted in Times
Square, New York,London, Glasgow, and several European cities which will be
reinforced this coming weekend by further events in opposition to a new war in
the Middle East with horrendous unforeseen consequences for the entire region
and global peace and security.
In London, British Premier,
David Cameron, faced an open revolt by as many as 70 Conservative Party Mp's who
demanded more time and further evidence be presented to parliament before a vote
would be taken and the British opposition Labour
Party leader, Ed Miliband, scuttled
Cameron's plans by announcing just after 5pm today that he would instruct his
MPs to vote against the government motion if a separate Labour amendment –
calling for any action to be delayed – was defeated.
House of Commons, Westminster.
Within two hours, Downing Street issued a statement, as it published its
motion for the debate, that a second vote would have to be held before Britain
joins any military action. The motion states: "Before any direct British
involvement in such action a further vote of the House of Commons will take
place."
An enraged Cameron turned on Miliband accusing him of having suffered a
giant "wobble" after he had appeared to indicate on Tuesday night
that he would be prepared to support military action, subject to legal
approval. But Labour hit back and said that the Prime Minister had been
resisting a second vote until Miliband tweeted his plan to table his own
amendment.
A Labour source said: "We will continue to scrutinise this motion but
at 5.15pm David Cameron totally ruled out a second vote, an hour and a half
later he changed his mind. EdMiliband was determined to do the right thing. It has
taken Labour forcing a vote to force the government to do the right
thing."
Downing Street spinners immediately said Cameron offered a
second vote because he wants to act in a consensual way. A spokesperson said:
"The Prime Minister is acutely aware of the deep concerns in the country
caused by what happened over Iraq. That's why we are committed to taking action
to deal with this war crime – but taking action in the right way, proceeding on
a consensual basis."
"So this motion endorses the government's consistent approach that we
should take action in response to Assad's chemical weapons attack; reflects the
need to proceed on a consensual basis, taking account of the work done by weapons
inspectors; and reflects the Prime Minister's respect for the UN process –
something he made clear to President Obama several days ago."
The Government move is likely to take the heat out of Thursday's parliamentary
debate that will be opened by Cameron at 2.30pm and wound up by Nick Clegg (Liberal Democrat), the
Deputy Prime Minister, at 10pm. The debate will be preceded by a meeting of the
cabinet that will receive a recommendation from the National Security Council
that Britain should join the military strikes. Dominic Grieve, the British
Attorney General, advised the NSC that such action would be legal under
international law. The shadow of War Criminal Blair's calculated deception of the House of Commons in 2003 over the preparations for War in Iraq loomed large over events in London today with newspaper polls reporting 74% of voters opposed to any new war in the Middle East.
The National Security Council reportedly also discussed a specific plan for
a British contribution to military action. This focused on a "limited
one-off" operation and the measures that might have to be taken to protect
British interests in the region, including the defence of the UK's sovereign
base in Cyprus, which is thought to be potentially within range of President
Assad's Scud missiles. The Cyprus Government is extremely alarmed at the
possibility of longer range Syrian missiles being fired at the British bases in
Akrotiri and hitting cities and towns in Cyprus by random off-target events.
Some sources in London speculated that it was possible the US would act
without British support – which would be a huge embarrassment for Cameron. It
would also be politically difficult for the White House. US officials have previously
been at pains to stress that the US would not act unilaterally, but in concert
with partners. The US claims that "it knows" that the Assad
government was the author of a chemical attack, as stated by Vice-President
Biden and Secretary of State John Kerry yesterday in bellicose statements
threatening use of force against Syria, is based on the dubious and partisan
reports from Israeli "intelligence" of alleged interception of Syrian
military cables discussing such an event. The US has failed to produce any concrete evidence from independent sources to back up it's slanderous claims. Not much different from the kind of "intelligence" presented to the
UN in 2003 as justification for the War and invasion of Iraq and later found to
be entirely spurious.
UNITED NATIONS:
Russia and China
refused to collaborate today with British attempts to rush the UN Security Council
into making a premature decision on using military force against Syria.
The permanent
representatives of Russia and China to the United Nations left the closed
meeting of the Security Council on Syria after its end, there was no demarche,
the Russian Permanent Mission to the UN told waiting Press representatives.
It was reported
earlier in the day that the Russian and Chinese officials had walked out of the
UN Security Council meeting in New York after US Permanent Representative
Samantha Power had called for an immediate action in Syria. The permanent members
of the UN Security Council – Russia, Britain, China, the US and France –
had been invited to the closed meeting. An hour later the Russian and Chinese
diplomats left the meeting and headed to the Security Council’s main conference
room where debates on Haiti was taking place.
Western countries
could have, until the end of the day, submitted to the Security Council a draft
resolution that would give the green light to an armed operation in Syria.
Russia and China, which have the right of veto in the Security Council, have
spoken up strongly against the use of force. However some Western countries have
made it clear that they might take measures without waiting for the U.N.
Security Council’s decision as they did in 1999 in Kosovo.
Russian Deputy
Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov said this would be a gross violation of
international law. “Certain states are ready to use force even before UN
experts make public the results of their investigation. Our country will be
committed to international law,” he said. “Modern international law allows the
use of force only in exceptional cases: for self-defence and if so authorised
by the UN Security Council. Some states see priorities in a distorted way.”
Meanwhile, Syria
has formally asked the UN to investigate three chemical attacks which the Syrian Government believes were carried
out by rebels in the suburbs of Damascus on August 22, 23 and 24.
Syrian Bishop
warns intervention could spark ‘world war’ :
A Syrian Chaldean
Catholic bishop on Monday warned that an armed intervention in Syria could
unleash a “world war”, while the Vatican’s official newspaper called for more
“prudence” from Western powers. “If there is an armed intervention, that would
mean, I believe, a world war. That risk has returned,” Monsignor Antoine Audo
of Aleppo told Vatican Radio.
“We hope that the
pope’s call for real dialogue between the warring parties to find a solution
can be a first step to stop the fighting,” he said. Bishop Audo is also the
head of the Syrian arm of the international Catholic charity Caritas and has
repeatedly warned about the human cost of the war.
Monsignor Antoine Audo of Allepo, Syria.
The Vatican daily,
L’Osservatore Romano, meanwhile criticised Western powers in an editorial. “The
drumbeat of an armed intervention by Western powers is becoming ever more
insistent and ever less restrained by prudence,” it said. “Several
representatives of these countries say they are convinced that the accusation
that the Syrian Army used chemical weapons is founded – a question which the
United Nations is investigating,” it said.
Pope Francis on
Sunday called for the international community to help find a solution to the
civil war.
“I launch an
appeal to the international community to be more sensitive to this tragic
situation and to commit itself to the maximum to help the dear Syrian nation
find a solution to a war which spreads destruction and death,” he said. Attacks on Christians, Chaldeans, Copts and other religious minorities are daily occurrences in Syria, Iraq and Egypt with no expressions of outrage from either Washington or London.
LIES, HYPOCRISY, WAR CRIMES:
The Union of Liars, Hypocrites and War Criminals =
NATO, were planning their own chemical attack in Syria according to the London
Daily Mail last January:
"London, Jan 30 (ANI): The Obama administration gave
green signal to a chemical weapons attack plan in Syria that could be blamed on
President Bashir al Assad's regime and in turn, spur international military
action in the devastated country, leaked documents have shown.
A new report, that contains an email exchange
between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence, showed
a scheme 'approved by Washington'.
As per the scheme 'Qatar would fund rebel forces in
Syria to use chemical weapons,' the Daily Mail reports.
Barack Obama made it clear to Syrian president
Bashar al-Assad last month that the U.S. would not tolerate Syria using
chemical weapons against its own people.
According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email
was sent from Britam's Business Development Director David Goulding to company
founder Philip Doughty.
The emails were released by a Malaysian hacker who
also obtained senior executives resumes and copies of passports via an
unprotected company server, according to Cyber War News.
According to the paper, the U.S. State Department
has declined to comment on the matter. (ANI)"
Italian Foreign Ministery, Rome. Italian Foreign Minister Emma Bonino says Italy will not support force in Syria without UN mandate:
"Italy will not take part in any military solutions without a UN
Security Council mandate," Foreign Minister Emma Bonino told
parliamentarians in Rome.
"
Even the option of a limited intervention risks becoming
unlimited," the minister said, adding that Italy was "already
stretched and even over-stretched" militarily in other parts of the
world.
"There is no military solution to the Syrian conflict. The only
solution is a negotiated political solution," she said, calling for
"great determination" in pursuing negotiations between the
warring sides. LONDON
National demonstration: No attack on Syria
Stop the War
Coalition, 31 August 2013.
National
Demonstration: assemble Saturday 31 August, 12 noon, Temple Place, London
(nearest tube Temple)
The national
demonstration on Saturday will gather at Temple Place (near Temple tube) and
march via Parliament and Downing Street, ending in central London for a
political rally to say No attack on Syria.
Called by Stop the
War and CND.
Statement on Syria
Stop the War Coalition, 27 August 2013.
The Stop the War Coalition strongly opposes any military
attack on Syria. While we oppose all use of chemical weapons, the latest
alleged such attack in Damascus should not be used as a pretext for further
exacerbating an already bloody civil war.
It seems that the Western governments have already made up
their minds about this attack before it has even been reported on by UN weapons
inspectors. They are demanding that ‘something must be done’ even though their
record of ‘doing something’ has been nothing short of catastrophic.
There have been numerous western interventions in the Middle
East and South Asia over the past 12 years. While the attacks on Afghanistan,
Iraq and Libya were all argued for on humanitarian grounds, they have all
increased the levels of killing and misery for the ordinary people of those
countries. They were in reality all about regime change. This is also what
Syria is about.
PARIS French National assembly will debate Syria crisis:
French President, François Hollande
The French
parliament will hold an emergency session to debate the Syria crisis on
September 4, minister Alain Vidalies said on Wednesday.
The announced
debate comes as France and US/UK threaten a potential military
intervention in Syria following an alleged chemical weapons attack last
week in the Damascus suburbs that the governments in Washington and London are blaming on the Assad regime.
"There will
be a special debate in the (lower house) National Assembly and in the
(upper house) Senate," said Vidalies, who is in charge of
relations between the Government and parliament.
It is as yet
unclear whether a military operation will take place over last Wednesday's
alleged attack and if it does, when it will happen. But, under French
law, a one-off military intervention does not need parliamentary approval.
French President François
Hollande gave a militant speech on Tuesday warning the Syrian regime of Bashar
al-Assad that France was "ready to punish" those responsible for the
chemical weapons attack. Hollande further
warned that the Syrian civil war posed "a threat to world peace." Stressing a
"responsibility to protect civilians," Hollande also said that
"chemical massacre cannot remain without a response from France." Neither Hollande or the French Government have produced any evidence associating the Assad regime with a chemical attack in Damascus but, have seen fit only to parrot Washington and London's disputed claims.
Hopefully, more sober elements of French politics will come to the fore in the debate.
IN WHOSE INTEREST?
Stock shares of perennial Defence
contracting powerhouse Raytheon hit nearly $77 apiece Tuesday as news of a
possible US strike in Syria intensified. The US has said if it strikes Syrian
government targets for alleged use of chemical weapons, it would likely use
Tomahawk cruise missiles from warships positioned in the Mediterranean.
Raytheon is responsible for making and selling the bulk of the long-range,
subsonic missiles to the US government.
Former Brit Prime Minister,
Margaret Hilda Thatcher, died early Monday, 8 April in London from the affects of a
stroke and promptly divided the country as she did when she was alive. The
usual gang of sycophants, who expressed admiration for Dame Hilda's combative
class war policies, queued up on British TV channels to whitewash the monster's
career and attempt to give a veneer of humanity to the personality who made it
her mission to wipe out effective trade unionism in Britain along with the
consensus Welfare State established in 1945 by the post-WW2 Labour Government.
Never an economist herself, Thatcher
swallowed whole the Neo-Liberal fantasies of the US right-wing and continued to
parrot the same ideas throughout her time in Downing Street(1979-90) until she
was unceremoniously dumped by her own Conservative Party in 1990. Hailed today by
the sycophant circus in London as a politician of "conviction"; so
was Hitler, so it depends on the content of the actual "convictions"
whether this appellation has any worthwhile meaning or not. She did succeed in
doing something Hitler failed to do with his Luftwaffe and Blitz on Britain
during WW2, that is, destroy Britain's manufacturing base which Thatcher did
with the stroke of a pen with her "privatisation" programme of
Britain's major traditional industries like shipbuilding, steel production,
vehicle manufacture, aircraft design and manufacture and of course her greatest
"triumph" the destruction of the coal mining industry, producing
large-scale unemployment and the heartless wiping out of communities and even
whole towns in those areas of the country dependent on this industry.
This
correspondent is proud to have been a member of the Dublin Council of TradeUnions during the 1984 Miners Strike in Britain, when we organised two ship
containers per week, one to Liverpool and one to Cardiff each week while the
strike continued; filled with food, clothing, household goods, children's toys
and other requirements for the miners and their families to counter Thatcher's
aims to starve the strikers into submission. We also arranged for the transfer
of NUM funds to Dublin banks where they were safe from confiscation by
Thatcher's kangaroo "Industrial Relations Court", staffed by legal
muppets of the Tory Party intent on trying to bankrupt the Trade Unions by
confiscating their funds. Despite an attempt by Thatcher's government to
sequester the funds in Dublin, the Irish Courts refused to comply as the Irish
Republic's constitution forbade the confiscation of private property.
Thatcher aligned herself with
Cold-War Washington, especially the Reagan regime which had the same dogmatic
character as herself, supported the continued possession of nuclear weapons
(the Trident submarine fleet bought from the US cost £12Bn) and NATO's first
strike policy; During her first year
as Prime Minister she supported NATO's decision to deploy US nuclear cruise and
Pershing missiles in Western Europe and permitted the US to station more than
160 cruise missiles at RAF Greenham Common, starting on 14 November 1983 and
triggering mass protests by the British Campaign for NuclearDisarmament;indulged
in flag-waving anti-Soviet and anti-communist/socialist rhetoric at every
opportunity all in the name of "freedom" and "liberty" but,
had no compunction in offering political and military support to such odious
regimes of murder and oppression as Pinochet's Chile and Botha's Apartheid South
Africa. Also as noted in today's bulletins from Tel-Aviv, she was a firm
supporter of Zionist Israel and its brutal oppression of the Palestinian
people. Freedom and Liberty how are ye, a dyed-in-the-wool hypocrite never
advancing an inch beyond her petty-bourgeois madam's restricted view of the
world in general.
In the Falklands/Malvinas war in
I982 following the invasion of the islands by the Military Dictatorship then
ruling in Argentina, Thatcher achieved further infamy by personally ordering
the sinking of the Argentine Navy light cruiser General Belgranoby the nuclear submarine HMS Conquerer,despite
the fact that Belgranowas leaving
the conflict zone and returning to port. Three hundred and twenty-three members of Belgrano's crew died in
the incident. Over 700 men were rescued from the open ocean despite cold seas
and stormy weather. The losses from Belgrano totalled nearly half of the
Argentine deaths in the Falklands/Malvinas conflict. This callous act caused the Irish Government,
then led by Charles J. Haughey as Taoiseach, to withdraw its support for the EU
imposed sanctions against Argentina and led to a bitter diplomatic hostility
between Dublin and London while Haughey was Taoiseach. Despite railing against
the military dictators in Argentina, Thatcher hypocritically continued to rely
on the neighbouring odious Pinochet regime in Chile for intelligence
against the Argentines and territorial backup for stray British aircraft having
to land there during the conflict. When Pinochet, under threat of arrest for
war crimes by courts in France and Spain arrived in London years later, Thatcher
was the only British politician to provide accommodation and a welcome for the
despicable war criminal and murderer.
Thatcher entertains War Criminal Pinochet in London.
Thatcher's policy in Northern
Ireland was an unmitigated disaster, prolonging the conflict for many more
years than was necessary given the legitimate demands for the
nationalist-minded population there for the same democratic standards which she
lauded for the rest of the UK. In
1980 and 1981, Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) and Irish National
Liberation Army (INLA) prisoners in Northern Ireland's Maze Prison carried out hunger
strikes in an effort to regain the status of political prisoners that had been
removed in 1976 under the preceding Labour government. Bobby Sands began the
1981 strike, saying that he would fast until death unless prison inmates won
concessions over their living conditions. Thatcher refused to countenance a
return to political status for the prisoners, declaring "Crime is crime is
crime; it is not political", but nevertheless the UK government privately
contacted Sinn Fein leaders in a bid to bring the hunger strikes to an end.
After the deaths of Sands and nine others, some rights were restored to
paramilitary prisoners, but not official recognition of their political status.
Violence in Northern Ireland escalated significantly during the hunger strikes;
in 1982, Sinn Féin politician Danny Morrison described Thatcher as "the
biggest bastard we have ever known".Thatcher's militarism and
gung-ho employment of illegal state murder campaigns only alienated the
population further and consolidated support for the IRA military responses
resulting in the assassination attempt on herself and her Conservative Party colleagues
in Brighton in 1984.
As with all despots, Thatcher
eventually got her comeuppance in 1990 when, despite opposition by most of her
cabinet colleagues, she insisted on pursuing her policy of imposing a local tax
dubbed the"Poll Tax", officially the "Community Charge"
ostensibly to fund local government services which she had stripped of funding
for many years previously and was first imposed in Scotland. Popular opposition
in Scotland led to the wipeout of her Conservative Party there and in England
& Wales a mounting crescendo of militant resistance led to the events of 31
March 1990 in London when a massive demonstration of over 200,000 protesters
blockaded central London from 11am in the morning until late in the night.
Aggressive police tactics, stupid in the extreme since they were severely outnumbered
by the huge crowd, led to the most serious outbreak of public violence ever in
the history of the British capital.
As a large cohort of mounted police
charged the crowd in Trafalgar Square, trampling many people in the process,
outraged protesters resisted and a violent melee spread throughout the central
area. Windows were smashed and buildings were set alight creating a scene of
utter mayhem in full view of the international press and TV, rapidly broadcast
throughout the world. What became known as the Poll Tax Riot shocked Thatcher's
cabinet and the British ruling elite, especially as they were told the next day
by London and Provincial police chiefs that the police forces did not possess enough resources to contain the
following weekend's planned demonstrations in every major city in Britain by
the organisers of the Anti-Poll Tax Campaign and Martial Law might have to be
considered as an option. The implementation of the poll tax in England &
Wales was immediately postponed and in November that year Thatcher was forced
into a leadership challenge by her cabinet colleagues and replaced by John
Major who abolished Thatcher's poll tax on the day he became Prime Minister.
The only liberty Thatcher was
really interested in was the liberty to exploit by the capitalist economic and
financial system by restricting trade union rights in Britain and facilitating
the export of British industrial jobs to Sweatshop Asia and de-regulating the
City of London stock market allowing the likes of Goldman Sachs to set up shop
in London along with the other fake credit fraudsters with their pyramid
schemes which has led directly to the current world crisis of financial
capitalism and the vicious class-war austerity attacks on working peoples
standard of living throughout the developed capitalist countries. Thatcher's
deliberate and planned destruction of Britain's industrial base has left the
country floundering in the weakest position of the major EU economies as it
struggles to survive the consequences of the collapse of the so-called
financial "industry", a corporate conspiracy which produces nothing
but debt based on false credit and is succeeding in its audacious claims on the
savings of ordinary people to pay off its gambling debts on an unprecedented
scale.
This is the real legacy left to
the British people by Dame Hilda and her Stock Market Bandits as we can
see today.
As this article is being posted,
spontaneous demonstrations of celebration of Thatcher's demise have started in
several cities throughout Britain, much to the chagrin of the Whore Press and
the Sycophant Circus in London!